Sokhey, Anand E. and Paul A. Djupe, editors. 2024. Trump, White Evangelical Christians, and American Politics: Change and Continuity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
We bring together a wide range of scholars and writers to examine the relationship between former President Donald Trump and white American evangelical Christians. They argue that, while this relationship—which saw evangelicals supporting a famously unfaithful, materialistic, and irreligious candidate despite self-defining in opposition to these characteristics—prompted many to wonder if Trump himself transformed American evangelical religion in politics, this alliance reflected both change and the outcome of dynamics that were in place or building for decades.
Contributors contextualize the Trump presidency within the story of religious demographic change, the growth of politicized religion, nationalistic religious expression, and the ways religion and politics in the United States are enmeshed in the politics of race. These investigations find that the idea of religious “transformation” is not accurate. Instead, the years 2015 to 2022 saw mainly minor changes to the ways religion appeared in public life—but these changes ultimately complemented and advanced an existing white evangelical strategy to increase political and social power as they became a demographic minority in the United States. Taken together, this collection reveals new insights for readers seeking to understand the religious dimensions of Trump’s rise, the reasons evangelicals become political activists, and the multifaceted alliances between secular politicians and conservative religious subcultures.
Contributors: Abraham Barranca, Ruth Braunstein, Ryan P. Burge, David E. Campbell, Jeremiah J. Castle, Paul A. Djupe, John C. Green, Sarah Heise, Geoffrey C. Layman, Andrew R. Lewis, Gerardo Martí, Eric L. McDaniel, Napp Nazworth, Shayla F. Olson, Enrique Quezada-Llanes, Kaylynn Sims, Anand Edward Sokhey, Hilde Løvdal Stephens, Kyla K. Stepp, Allan Tellis.
Djupe, Paul A., Andrew R. Lewis, and Anand E. Sokhey. 2023. The Full Armor of God: The Mobilization of Christian Nationalism in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009234078
Academic research on Christian nationalism has revealed a considerable amount about the scope of its relationships to public policy views in the US. However, work thus far has not addressed an essential question: why now? Research by the authors of this Element advances answers, showcasing how deeper engagement with ‘the 3Ms’ – measurement, mechanisms and mobilization – can help unpack how and why Christian nationalism has entered our politics as a partisan project. Indeed, it is difficult to understand the dynamics of Christian nationalism without reference to the parties, as it has been a worldview used to mobilize Republicans while simultaneously recruiting and demobilizing Democrats. The mechanisms of these efforts hinge on a deep desire for social dominance that is ordained by God – an order elites suggest is threatened by Democrats and ‘the left.’ These elite appeals can have sweeping consequences for opinion and action, including the public’s support for democratic processes.
Djupe, Paul A. and Amanda J. Friesen, editors. 2023. ‘An Epidemic Among My People:’ Religion, Politics, and COVID-19 in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
The pandemic presented religion as a paradox: faith is often crucial for helping people weather life’s troubles and make difficult decisions, but how can religion continue to deliver these benefits and provide societal structure without social contact? The topical volume, An Epidemic among My People, explains how the COVID-19 pandemic stress tested American religious communities and created a new politics of religion centered on public health.
We consider how the virus and government policy affected religion in America. Chapters examine the link between the prosperity gospel and conspiracy theories, the increased purchase of firearms by evangelicals, the politics of challenging public health orders as religious freedom claims, and the reactions of Christian nationalists, racial groups, and female clergy to the pandemic (and pandemic politics). As sharp lines were drawn between people and their governments during this uncertain time, An Epidemic among My People provides a comprehensive portrait of religion in American public life.
Contributors: Daniel Bennett, Kraig Beyerlein, Cammie Jo Bolin, Ryan P. Burge, Angel Saavedra Cisneros, Ryon J. Cobb, Melissa Deckman, Joshua B. Grubbs, Don Haider-Markel, Ian Huff, Natalie Jackson, Jason Klocek, Benjamin Knoll, Andrew R. Lewis, Jianing Li, Natasha Altema McNeel, Matthew R. Miles, Shayla F. Olson, Diana Orcés, Samuel L. Perry, Jenna Reinbold, Kelly Rolfes-Haase, Stella M. Rouse, Justin A. Tucker, Dilara K. Üsküp, Abigail Vegter, Michael W. Wagner, Andrew L. Whitehead, Angelia R. Wilson, and the editors.
In the series The Religious Engagement in Democratic Politics.
Djupe, Paul A., Amy Erica Smith, and Anand E. Sokhey. 2022. The Knowledge Polity: Research and Teaching in the Social Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
Motivated by findings of differences in critical dimensions of the research process between men and women, we undertook a sweeping investigation of knowledge production in two social science disciplines: political science and sociology. We conceive of these societies as knowledge polities, with rights and responsibilities, social ties and institutional connections, and personal predilections and varying motivations – together, these factors shape how academics contribute. Coupling an original study (the 2017 Professional Activity in the Social Sciences (PASS) survey) with publicly available data on academic visibility, we produce an incredibly detailed view of what academics do with their time, and of how they produce, pass on, and judge knowledge. Across chapters that focus on everything from submission practices, to teaching, peer review, and blogging, we illuminate a variety of dynamics as they relate to gender and race/ethnicity, and provide data-driven commentary on the ways in which knowledge is produced in the social sciences.
Djupe, Paul A. and Ryan L. Claassen. 2018. The Evangelical Crackup? The Future of the Evangelical-Republican Coalition. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Why did Donald Trump attract a record number of white evangelical voters without unified support—and despite nontrivial antipathy from evangelical leaders? The editors and leading scholars that contribute to the timely volume The Evangelical Crackup? answer this question and provide a comprehensive assessment of the status of evangelicals and the Christian Right in the Republican coalition.
The expected “crackup” with the Republican Party never happened. Each chapter in this cogent volume includes analyses of the 2016 election to explain why—and why that is critical. Chapters examine policy priorities, legal advocacy, and evangelical loyalty to the Republican Party; rhetoric, social networks, and evangelical elite influence; and the political implications of movements within evangelicalism, such as young evangelicals, Hispanics, and the Emergent Church movement.
Contributors include: Daniel Bennett, Mark Brockway, Ryan P. Burge, Brian R. Calfano, Jeremy Castle, Kimberly Conger, Daniel A. Cox, Kevin den Dulk, Sarah Allen Gershon, Tobin Grant, Robert P. Jones, Geoffrey Layman, Andrew R. Lewis, Ronald J. McGauvran, Joshua Mitchell, Juhem Navarro-Rivera, Jacob R. Neiheisel, Elizabeth Oldmixon, Adrian D. Pantoja, David Searcy, Anand Edward Sokhey, J. Benjamin Taylor, Robert Wuthnow, and the editors
In the series The Religious Engagement in Democratic Politics, edited by me.
Djupe, Paul A., Mark J. Rozell, and Ted G. Jelen. Editors. 2020. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics and Religion. New York: Oxford University Press. All articles are online.
As coeditor-in-chief with Mark Rozell (George Mason University) and Ted Jelen (UNLV), we assembled a great team of associate editors (listed below) and recruited over 100 authors from across the world to write over 100 articles representing the major lines of inquiry in religion and politics. Each article (~6k words) attempts to cover the state of research at this date and therefore constitutes an enormous resource to scholars new and old looking to understand and engage with research questions. Articles can be found here. Blog posts providing a more extensive introduction are here, here, and here.
We’ve been working with an outstanding team of associate editors, almost all of whom are also contributors to the project (in alphabetical order):
Gizem Arikan, Trinity College Dublin
Pazit Ben-Nun Bloom, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Taylor Boas, Boston University
Steven Kettell, University of Warwick
Amy Erica Smith, Iowa State University
Güneş Murat Tezcür, University of Central Florida
Djupe, Paul A., editor. 2015. Religion and Political Tolerance in America: Advances in the State of the Art. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
After a comprehensive review of work on the link between religion and political tolerance and the remaining gaps, a top-notch set of contributors explores religion and tolerance among elites (for the first time among clergy too), the effect of clergy on members’ political tolerance, new looks at religiosity and mass tolerance and its antecedents, new investigations of religious value effects, and then how religious groups respond to intolerance. The volume marks a number of entirely new ways to examine the religion-tolerance connection and should fuel research for a generation.
Djupe, Paul A. and Brian R. Calfano. 2013. God Talk: Experimenting with the Religious Causes of Public Opinion. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Religion’s influence on public opinion, politics, and candidates has been widely discussed in political science for a generation. God Talk is the first volume that uses experimental methodology to establish whether and how that influence works. We provide an unprecedented look at how religious cues, values, and identity-driven appeals impact candidate selection, trust, interest group support, and U.S. public opinion about tolerance, the environment, foreign policy, and related issues.
By situating our disparate, randomly assigned interventions within the broader framework of elite-based influence, we apply their new methodology to three questions: How do congregation-based elites affect congregation members? How are religious elites and groups and their public arguments evaluated? With what effect do political elites use religion? The results of the research provide a compelling framework for understanding the links between religion and politics.
“This is one book that does not suffer from a lack of ambition. Paul A. Djupe and Brian R. Calfano set out to change not only the way that scholars think about religion’s influence on public opinion but also the methods that scholars use to investigate those relationships.” David O’Connell, PSQ.
“What distinguishes God Talk…is the care with which each experiment is designed and discussed, and the contextualizing of each within broader themes and ideas.” Contemporary Sociology 43(6): 874.
Djupe, Paul A. and Christopher P. Gilbert. 2009. The Political Influence of Churches. New York: Cambridge University Press.
We investigate the political influence of church: how membership in organized religious bodies shapes the political life of members. Our goal in this inquiry is to re-center scholarly attention on the voluntary association as an essential element of American civic and political life. We develop a theoretical framework that captures the multifaceted elements of church life that affect individual political attitudes and actions. Political information from clergy, small groups, and social networks flows plentifully in churches, but individuals process that information differently depending on their motivations related to their status in the church. Articulating a more fully specified model of how associations expose individuals to political information and norms will help us understand the political opinions and behavior of citizens and the contribution of that pattern to sustaining democracy.
“Djupe and Gilbert have written an important book on the impact of religion on the politics of individual church members. Rather than viewing religion from afar – as another characteristic held by individuals or another organization to which some individuals belong – they look at it from the inside. They consider the structure of life in churches, and the networks of relationships that connect church members to each other and to the world outside the church. This produces a very sophisticated treatment of the contingent circumstances under which churches make a difference in the politics of church members. By giving primary attention to the patterns of social interaction and communication within churches, the authors produce a masterful analysis that is reminiscent of the classical treatment given to labor union politics by Lipset, Trow, and Coleman in Union Democracy. Political science needs more studies like this one.”
-Robert Huckfeldt, University of California, Davis
“The Political Influence of Churches will be a genuinely seminal book. Djupe and Gilbert combine sophisticated theoretical understandings of religion and of group dynamics with an ambitious research design and resourceful data analysis. The authors’ emphasis on the complex social interactions which take place within congregations will change the way in which we think about political learning in religious settings, and will affect future research in religion and politics for years to come.”
-Ted G. Jelen, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
“Paul A. Djupe and Christopher P. Gilbert have written a forceful book that uses state of the art data to show that churches are about more than religion when it comes to politics. They are complex social organisms that support a wide variety of political behaviors, all of which are key to understanding how these people become citizens.”
-Scott D. McClurg, Southern Illinois University
“This book offers path-breaking analysis of how being active in religious life affects Americans’ political orientations. Active participation in a religious congregation is perhaps the most widespread form of voluntary association in American society today, and Djupe and Gilbert elucidate exactly how such social networking shapes the way we obtain and use political information. This book is sure to be a seminal work in the literature on religion and politics.”
-Laura Olson, Clemson University
“Paul Djupe and Christopher P. Gilbert have published a series of intriguing papers on the politics of mainline Protestant churches. With this book they show us the full scope of this project, and the result is a volume that political scientists, sociologists, and anyone else who is interested in the political influence of churches needs to read.”
-Clyde Wilcox, Georgetown University[to top]
Djupe, Paul A. and Laura R. Olson, editors. 2007. Religious Interests in Community Conflict: Beyond the Culture Wars. Waco: Baylor University Press.
“A study of religious engagement at the community level by a distinguished team of researchers, this volume provides fodder for a strong conclusion anchored in social and political theory. This important book is exciting both for what it does and for the subsequent work it will stimulate.” -Kenneth D. Wald, Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Florida
“This is not your standard edited collection, but a multi-pronged, multi-scholar research project focused around the key research questions of the motives and consequences of religious involvement in community conflict, and centered on four areas of public concern: moral issues, race relations, social justice, and the public square. This volume is a broad but deep examination of religion’s involvement in local community political life, from cities to small towns, and in different regions across the nation.” -Rhys Williams, Professor of Sociology, University of Cincinnati
“This volume is a welcome addition to the field of religion and politics. The book’s methodological diversity and emphasis on both key social issues such as gay marriage, as well as long standing political concerns such as homelessness and healthcare, showcase effectively the many ways in which religious groups engage in community conflict. The editors do a nice job of integrating the findings into the larger scholarship on interest groups, ensuring that Religious Interests makes an important theoretical contribution to political science. -Melissa Deckman, Associate Professor of Political Science, Washington College[to top]
Djupe, Paul A. and Christopher P. Gilbert. 2003. The Prophetic Pulpit: Clergy, Churches, and Communities in American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Despite decades of claims to the contrary, the United States remains a deeply religious nation and American religious professionals occupy a prominent role in shaping the interests and attitudes of their congregations. In this timely and groundbreaking work, we analyze national data from a survey of over 2,400 Episcopal and Evangelical Lutheran Church of America clergy, looking deeper into their motivations for political action. Using the survey data, we argue that while personal motivations are a factor, the decisions clergy make about their role in political and civic life are greatly affected by the specific needs of their congregations and communities as well as ongoing influences from their denominations. As we head into another election season, The Prophetic Pulpit highlights the importance of every player in the political arena.
“This is a very perceptive book–especially its attention to the dynamic interplay between clergy, their congregations, and the broader community. The authors write clearly and support their arguments with an unprecedented array of data and evidence. The Prophetic Pulpit focuses on clergy politics, but also illumines the broader issues of religion and American politics.”
-Daniel J. B. Hofrenning, St. Olaf College
“This is an outstanding book, full of important and path-breaking findings about the full range of factors that drive clergy’s decisions about taking political action. Djupe and Gilbert show that the external contexts in which clergy live and work have profound ramifications for their attitudes about political engagement.”
-Laura R. Olson, Clemson University
“Djupe and Gilbert are to be commended for a path-breaking study that challenges numerous stereotypes of mainline clergy activism and that paves the way for more sophisticated scholarship in the field.”
“In this fine book, Djupe and Gilbert provide an exemplar for future studies of clerical politics in the United States. This nuanced, methodologically sophisticated study will give pause to those who are too quick to relegate the Protestant Mainline to the political sideline.”
-Ted G. Jelen, University of Nevada, Las Vegas[to top]
Gilbert, Christopher P., David A.M. Peterson, Timothy R. Johnson, and Paul A. Djupe. 1999. Religious Institutions and Minor Parties in the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger.
We examine the impact of churches and church membership patterns on third parties and independent candidates in 20th-century U.S. politics. Candidates who choose not to run for office under the rubric of a major party face a well-known set of obstacles, yet the absence of discussion about the interconnections between religious institutions and minor parties is striking. The book presents a theoretical framework for understanding how religious institutions create, support, and sustain the political culture of local communities; by playing this role religious institutions support major parties and impede the electoral chances of political outsiders.
The book’s central finding is that third candidates are not privy to the ties that bind Democratic and Republican voters to their parties; one of the factors that creates and strengthens such ties is religion. Therefore, third candidates do best where church and party loyalties are weakest, or where third candidates have existing bases of support. The rare third candidate or minor party that possesses a base of support centered around a denomination or religious group can overcome such barriers. These conclusions are supported by analysis of census data, election returns, and voter surveys spanning the 20th century. Special attention is given to the 1992 and 1996 presidential candidacies of H. Ross Perot. This is an important analysis for scholars and other researchers dealing with American third parties and independent candidates and the impact of religion on politics.[to top]
Djupe, Paul A. and Laura R. Olson, editors. 2002/2008. The Encyclopedia of American Religion and Politics. New York: Facts-on-File.
This encyclopedia brings together “in one place ‘the facts’ about the people, groups, jurisprudence, forces, and phenomena that together tell the story of the interaction between religion and politics in America.” A team of 135 scholars wrote the more than 600 entries, which focus on several themes, among them the roles played by religious organizations and beliefs in shaping American politics; religion and the Constitution; and the intersections between religion, political theory, and public policy.[to top]